Compare two written card-payment quotes across in-person, online and overseas sales plus quiet, typical and busy months.
Compare two written quotes against how customers actually pay and how trading changes through the year. Figures remain in this browser.
How this calculation works
Each quote applies separate percentage rates to in-person, online and overseas-card turnover, adds per-transaction and fixed charges, respects a monthly minimum, then weights quiet, typical and busy months. One-off and exit costs are kept visible.
The values pre-filled above are examples only. Replace every figure with your own provider quote, statement and operating assumptions.
What to check
- Use written rates and identify exactly which cards qualify
- Make quiet, typical and busy months total twelve
- Record unmodelled gateway, refund, chargeback, PCI, hardware, VAT and settlement terms beside the downloaded report
Worked scenario
The example separates in-person, online and overseas-card turnover, then applies three quiet, six typical and three busy months. Replace every tariff and trading assumption with the exact written quotes and your own representative figures.
Questions people ask
Does the lower estimate prove the quote is better?
No. It compares entered costs only. Card eligibility, settlement, support, reliability and unmodelled terms can outweigh the displayed difference.
Why show the contract term?
A low annual estimate can still carry a long commitment. Review termination rights and total exposure separately before signing.
Make a like-for-like decision
Run a quiet, normal and busy scenario. Record the source and date of every input, keep one-off and recurring charges separate, and compare settlement timing, support, contract length and exit terms as well as price. A small numerical advantage is not useful if it depends on an unrealistic card mix or turnover.